Santa Monica Area Health, Beauty and Fitness | Chemical Companies Profit from Fluoridating Drinking Water

Those with any awareness greater than that of a slug know that the fluoride compound added to public drinking water supplies is a toxic waste.  They know that the fluoride added to toothpaste is more than sufficient to protect teeth.  Adding more fluoride to drinking water is superfluous and dangerous.

But, the reason for fluoridation of public drinking water supplies, the proponents say, is "for the children (sob, sniffle, snuffle)".  That is totally disingenuous:  Almost everyone is getting fluoride already in their toothpaste.  (In fact, there is a warning to parents on fluoridated toothpaste packages NOT to let their precious little spawn swallow the toothpaste because of the fluoride content.)  Why should most of us be subjected to a double dose because some idiot parents don't get their brats to brush their teeth, or that they have spawned so many that they can't afford toothpaste?  Excuse me, but screw 'em!

I, for one, nearly puke every time the old "for the children" bromide is trotted out.  Every pussy and petit-fascist jumps on every "boo-hoo" cause that comes along to promote more "nanny-state" government meddling.  This is a biggie -- "the health of our chi-i-i-i-ldre-e-e-e-e-n!"  How could anyone but an ogre question something to promote "the health of our chi-i-i-i-ldre-e-e-e-e-n!"?  Barf!

THE REAL REASON for fluoridating drinking water supplies is simply to increase chemical company PROFITS at the expense of both our wallets and our mental and physical health.

The fluoride chemical compound added to our drinking water is a toxic waste resulting from manufacturing that would cost the chemical companies a great deal of money to dispose of properly.

What a coincidence it was that the chemical companies were able to discover self-serving medical studies promoting the so-called benefits of adding that troublesome toxic fluoride waste to drinking water supplies.  Or did they finance that "research"?  How fortunate that there is supposedly a marketable use for it rather than having to go to the expense of safely disposing of it.

After discovering -- or financing -- the "save the children" "benefit" of the toxic fluoride chemical waste, the next step in the chemical companies' plans was to get corrupt local officials on their side.  Does money deposited into an offshore bank account sound like a possible incentive?  Does being able to position themselves as "guardians of the future -- our children" and thus secure re-election by the booboisie sound like a possible incentive?  So, with those incentives, the officials then get the local water districts to actually PAY the chemical companies to take the toxic waste off their hands.  The "rebate" then paid to officials is but a minor portion of the vast additional profits the chemical companies obtain from what would otherwise be a troublesome source of tremendous expense.

The chemical companies themselves are but one participant in the scheme.  Another source of income for the public officials greenlighting fluoridation of the public water supplies is from the various companies manufacturing water treatment and adulteration equipment.  Undoubtedly, the chemical companies own in part, at least, the major players in that area, as another "profit center".

Here's an assignment for some enterprising investigative reporters in the MAJOR media:  FOLLOW THE MONEY.  (Oh, I forgot, the owners of the major media are also on the take.  Never mind.)

For more about the physical and brain chemistry problems resulting from fluoridation of drinking water supplies, look up Fluoride Alert.

IMPORTANT LINKS

e-gold Exchanger News Blog